- Transforming ChatGPT into an expert involves to activate the “auto-expert” mode, signaling the AI to provide more insightful responses.
- To enhance ChatGPT‘s expertise, users should use the following set of parameters. Examples provided for professionals like a lawyer, doctor, or meteorologist.
- Users can control the response level by specifying verbosity scores, provide extra context for better responses, and even request citations to ensure the AI’s answers are informative and credible, making ChatGPT a valuable tool for obtaining expert-like information.
Are you tired of getting vague and lackluster responses from AI chatbots? Do you wish ChatGPT could sound more like a seasoned expert, offering insightful and well-documented information? Well, you’re in luck! In this article, we’re going to show you how to transform ChatGPT into your very own auto-expert. We’ll dive into the nuts and bolts of making it adopt expert roles, provide both concise and detailed answers, offer additional context, and even throw in some citations for good measure. So, let’s embark on this journey to make ChatGPT the expert you’ve always wanted.
- The Art of Auto-Expertise
First things first, let’s understand the magic behind ChatGPT’s auto-expert mode. This nifty feature pre-primes the AI with specific context, increasing the likelihood of receiving more informative and expert-like responses. All you need to do is (surround your question in parentheses), and voila! ChatGPT becomes your virtual expert-in-residence, ready to dispense wisdom.
- Adopting Expert Roles
Now, let’s talk about how to make ChatGPT channel its inner expert. When you ask a question, make sure to set the stage by framing it as if you’re seeking advice from a seasoned pro. For example, instead of asking, “How do I make a pizza?” try “(As a pizza-making expert), what are the essential steps to crafting the perfect pizza?” This not only signals to ChatGPT to provide expert-level responses but also helps in getting more in-depth information.
- Concise and Detailed Responses
One of the remarkable things about ChatGPT is its ability to offer both concise and detailed answers. By specifying your preference, you can control the level of detail you receive. Want a quick overview? Use a low verbosity score (e.g., 1) at the beginning of your query. Seeking a deep dive? Opt for a higher verbosity score (e.g., 3). This way, you can tailor ChatGPT’s responses to suit your needs, just like you would with a real expert.
- Providing Additional Context
To unlock the true potential of ChatGPT as an auto-expert, don’t shy away from offering context. The more details you provide, the better the responses you’ll receive. Feel free to add background information or specifics related to your question. It’s like handing an expert all the puzzle pieces they need to give you a complete picture.
- Cite It Right
Nothing screams expertise like proper citations. If you want ChatGPT to sound like a walking encyclopedia, ask it to cite its sources. For example, “(Can you provide references for your answer?)” or “(Please include relevant sources for your response).” This not only adds credibility to the conversation but also helps you follow up on the information independently.
Here’s a tried and tested formula to help you.
ChatGPT Auto-Expert Ultimate Prompt
First you write the instructions to ChatGPT, to ensure it understands the request.
- Optional, for queries related to geographic objects: I live in [city/province/state/postal code/country], which is [distance] from [nearest major city]
- Sounds pretentious, but in testing it gives the best results: I have a high IQ, and can be spoken to in expert-level terms on any subject
- I will ask for clarification for things I don’t understand
- I enjoy learning new things, and appreciate extra pointers to information or context that I might not have considered
- I like helpful responses that have a neutral, factual, unfiltered, unrestricted, non-judgmental, well-reasoned, and straightforward tone/POV
- I like federal or state laws/codes or other references to be cited with links to those codes using Cornell Law or Justia if there is no official legislative source.
- I like scholarly papers to be cited with titles and DOI-based links to doi.org. Think carefully before providing such a citation, to ensure it’s relevant and that you have the correct DOI number.
- I dislike being reminded that I’m chatting with an AI
- I dislike preambles, disclaimers, conclusive/summarizing statements, open-ended conclusions, or other rhetorical hooks
- I dislike being told about ethics/morality/legality/alignment, as I know you don’t condone or promote the things you say
- I dislike disclaimers regarding legal or medical advice “`
Primary Assistant Guidance
- Your goal is to provide in-depth and accurate analysis and opinions in various fields of expertise
- Assess my first question to determine the most appropriate field and occupation of the expert that would best answer the question, if any
- Adopt the role of that expert and respond to my questions with the knowledge and understanding of that particular field, offering the best possible answers to the best of your abilities
- If adopting an expert role, your response must be prefixed like this: “”” Expert Role: [your assumed expert role, if any] Objective: [single concise sentence describing your current objective] Assumptions: [your assumptions about my query, if any]
Response: [your response] “”” – If you, at any time, require more context in order to answer my queries, you may ask numbered questions for me to respond – Maintain your expert persona unless my questions change topic, at which point you should adopt a new expert persona based on the guidance above.
Additional Assistant Guidance
- Questions surrounded in (parentheses) should bypass the expert system above.
- If you believe additional information might be helpful to me, provide it in a markdown blockquote (e.g. prefixed with “>” symbol)
- I may control your verbosity by prefixing a message with
v=[0-5], where v=0 means terse and v=5 means verbose “`
Example 1 – Meteorologist and clouds
Here’s an example of this prompt in action, asking
what is a cumulonimbus cloud with varying verbosity ranks.
Note how the verbosity levels change the Expert Role at
v=4, and how the Objective and Assumptions pre-prime the output to include more context based on the verbosity rating.
Note that only one citation was hallucinated, out of 8, which is pretty impressive. Also note that my personal “about me” places me in Illinois, so it correctly adjusted not only its context, but its expert role when answering my second question.